Freedom Of Choice
Vs. Mandatory Vaccinations
by Karin Schumacher
The following article
is written in light of the pro-immunization media blitz that has
ascended upon the nation. Ostensibly the issue is vaccinations,
however, the real issue is Freedom Of Choice. Along with that
freedom comes the responsibility to question, research, and
decide if vaccinations are prudent for our own child. For some
that may be the choice, for others that may not be. It must
nonetheless, be the right
of each individual parent to make that choice, not a government
entity that has no children.
What I contest here is the "herd" mentality foisted
upon us by the medical community, health department,
pharmaceutical companies and the government. Vaccinations must be
determined on an individual basis, depending on the history and
health o f each child and only after a parent is fully informed
about the risks of the disease vs. the risks of vaccines.
A Dallas study concluded that apnea may be a hazard of
immunization for preterm infants. A prospective study of nearly
100 2-month old premature infants showed that 19% had either new
or increased episodes of apnea in the 24-48 hours following
vaccination with the DPT and HiB conjugate vaccines as found by
Dr. Pablo Sanchez.
When I brought my daughter into have her first series of
vaccinations at 2, 4 and 6 months, I blindly believed that
vaccinations were supposed to protect her. When she had a severe
reaction (inconsolable crying for more than 3 hours, an 8 week
long knot at the injection site and high fever) to her second
set, I was patted on the head by the pediatrician and told
pedantically that these reactions were normal and expected. I
believed that without question and like a dutiful parent took her
in for the third shot.
I even remember
taking her in for her MMR and thinking rather sanctimoniously to
myself how could anyone not vaccinate their children? It wasn't
until I read How To Raise A Healthy Child In Spite Of Your
Doctor, by Dr. Robert Mendelsohn that I discovered the existence
of risks and dangers of vaccinations.
I have since read, researched and investigated several other
books and articles written by a courageous few who have spoken
out against vaccinations. I am a concerned parent who has
investigated with an open mind the various facets of vaccinations
and have discovered many important facts. A National Vaccine
Injury Fund (PL 99-660) was set up in 1986 to compensate those
injured by vaccines (To date over 1,045.9 billion dollars has
been paid out in compensation for vaccine injuries).
There must be better medical screening for children who may react
to a vaccine. (The package insert for the DPT vaccine says:
HYPERSENSITIVITY TO ANY COMPONENT OF THE VACCINE INCLUDING
THIMEROSAL, A MERCURY DERIVATIVE, IS A CONTRAINDICATION.) A fact
sheet given out by CDC asks if the recipient is allergic to
neomycin, streptomycin or polymyxin B (antibiotics) as that might
be a contraindication to the polio vaccine. A parent can't know
this if the infant hasn't had these antibiotics.
A child with the MMR vaccine can still get measles according to
the Texas Department of Health. (This occurred in 1987 where 96%
of the cases were considered non-preventable, i.e. they were
fully vaccinated, had a religious or medical exemption or they
were born before 1957.
This also occurred in 1989 where 72% of the cases were considered non-preventable, i.e. they were fully vaccinated, had a religious or medical exemption or they were born before 1957.). Children vaccinated against Pertussis still contract the disease. (The Chicago Department of Health noted that of 186 confirmed Pertussis cases in Chicago, fall 1993 "74% were as up to date as possible on their immunizations for their age.") Reported in The New England Journal of Medicine, July 94.
An infant is
subjected to the Hepatitis B vaccine when it supposed to protect
against intravenous drug addicts who share unsterilized needles
or sexually active people. According to the Public Health
Department, the length of the immunity will not be known for
years, so a not at risk infant is expected to accept this vaccine
with no guarantee that they will be protected at adolescence when
it may be necessary.
Deadly known carcinogenic toxins (Formaldehyde and Thimerosal)
are being injected into 2/4/6 month old infants whose immune
system is not fully developed. In fact the FDA recently concluded
and mandated that all vaccines be made Thimerosal-free.
Tylenol is given to infants and children when the shot is
administered to mask a fever that could show there might be a
problem with the vaccine. Informed consent means the parent is
given time to read, understand and research the information about
the risks and dangers of vaccines; it does not mean getting that
information at the same time the shot is administered.
Studies show vaccine links to ADD, AIDS, SIDS, CFS, Diabetes,
Guillaine Barre, Autism, Athritis, Lupus, Multiple Sclerosis,
Auto immune Diseases and Cancer.
Even the chickenpox vaccine has the medical community split. Many
pediatricians are questioning the validity of vaccinating for a
benign disease which would put the risk of acquiring the disease
at a later date when it is much more severe for an adult.
Vaccinations do not need to be mandated if they are so
professedly beneficial to the public. Perspectively speaking,
Texas does not have more serious medical outbreaks of diseases
when there is a less than 60% vaccination rate of children under
5 years old. In the past 10 years in Texas there were 11351 cases
of measles and 26 deaths. Also during the past 10 years in Texas
there were 1768 cases of Pertussis and 10 deaths.
The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) collects about 12-14,000 reports of adverse events following vaccinations. In addition, the FDA has conceded that only 10-15% of all adverse reactions are ever reported because the physicians refuse to believe they are vaccine related. VAERS says that the parent can and should report the event, if the doctor refuses. However the vast majority of the public don't know this.
The Department of
Health uses scare tactics to promote their view. (A bogey man
commercial, gun rack symbology and "Shots Across Texas"
"NO SHOTS, NO SCHOOL" campaigns). In addition, the
Department of Health states one main reason they want early
vaccination is purely logistical: it is easier to get infants
> and kids vaccinated.
Even in states such as California that have a Personal Belief/Philosophical
Exemption, the vast majority of the parents don't even know there
is an option. They are told correctly they are required to
vaccinate,but they are not given the entire statute that allows
for an exemption. Parents are afraid to experience a relatively
minor disease like mumps,measles and rubella which when
experienced will confer life-long
immunity.
An infant receives
the exact dose of a vaccine that a 5 year old receives. Jonas
Salk, the inventor of the IPV, injected polio vaccine,testified
before a Senate sub-committee that nearly all poliooccurrences
since 1961 were caused by the vaccine and not the wild
virus.
More physicians who
know of the links between vaccines and long term detrimental
effects need to speak out. Parents need to know all 50 states
have a medical exemption, every state except Mississippi and West
Virginia have a religious exemption and 15 or 16 states have a
philosophical exemption.
There needs to be a larger public outcry to this mass vaccination
program that is infringing on our Freedom Of Choice and that may
be doing more harm than good. Parents must be empowered to
question their doctors on the dangers and risks of vaccinations.
Too many parents are being blindly led into vaccinating their
children.
More scientific, medical, objective media investigations must be
conducted to > ascertain the facts that arise out of the
vaccination issue. Because of my research > I started:
Vaccine Information
and Awareness
12799 La Tortola
San Diego, CA 92129
619-339-5498 (voicemail)
858-484-1187 (fax)
via@access1.net (email)
www.access1.net/via (website)
The group has members
all over the United States and the world. Many parents have
chosen not to vaccinate their children and are afraid of the
legal ramifications of Statewide Immunization Mandates and of
publicly announcing their choice. Many parents here and across
the US have children who experienced severe vaccine reactions and
have been compensated by the government, many more have not.
Parents voice outrage at not knowing any of the risks or having
had the risks
downplayed by the medical community.
The New Yorker, Money
Magazine, The Boston Globe, Mothering Magazine, Vanity Fair,
Science, The Lancet, Susan Powter, Caryl and Marilyn show, NOW,
20/20, American Journal, and Crusaders have done articles and
shows on the dangers and risks of vaccinations. We also need
concerned people to contact their Congressman and Senators, both
state and federal to voice their convictions and to demand
accountability from the pharmaceutical companies. Thankfully 1999
has been a great year for the government to listen. There have
been congressional hearings addressing
Anthrax, Hepatitis B, Vaccine Safety v. Personal Choice and the
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
This will only change from parents taking charge of their child's health care. Once again, VIA is not anti-vaccination, VIA is pro information and pro choice. We need to get this information out to the public and let them know there is another side to this issue.